TY - JOUR
T1 - What gives you a social licence? An exploration of the social licence to operate in the australian mining industry
AU - Bice, Sara
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 by the authors.
PY - 2014/3/1
Y1 - 2014/3/1
N2 - This article analyses the ways in which major, multinational mining companies operating within Australia understand sustainable development and articulate their "social licence to operate". The article contributes a novel perspective to ongoing discussions about the social licence by exploring the ways in which leading Australian mining companies define and assert their social licences through sustainable development discourse. A content and discourse analysis of 18 sustainability reports across a four year period, supplemented by qualitative interview data, draws out these issues. While most companies use these reports to confirm beliefs in the necessity of a social licence, the ways in which the licence is specifically defined and maintained are not generally made explicit. Additionally, key theoretical criteria required for a social licence, such as free, prior and informed consent, appear to be overlooked. In conclusion, the article suggests ways in which criteria for a social licence within the mining industry could be defined more clearly and raises consequent questions to shape future research.
AB - This article analyses the ways in which major, multinational mining companies operating within Australia understand sustainable development and articulate their "social licence to operate". The article contributes a novel perspective to ongoing discussions about the social licence by exploring the ways in which leading Australian mining companies define and assert their social licences through sustainable development discourse. A content and discourse analysis of 18 sustainability reports across a four year period, supplemented by qualitative interview data, draws out these issues. While most companies use these reports to confirm beliefs in the necessity of a social licence, the ways in which the licence is specifically defined and maintained are not generally made explicit. Additionally, key theoretical criteria required for a social licence, such as free, prior and informed consent, appear to be overlooked. In conclusion, the article suggests ways in which criteria for a social licence within the mining industry could be defined more clearly and raises consequent questions to shape future research.
KW - Mining
KW - Social licence to operate
KW - Sustainability reports
KW - Sustainable development
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906775156&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/resources3010062
DO - 10.3390/resources3010062
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84906775156
SN - 2079-9276
VL - 3
SP - 62
EP - 80
JO - Resources
JF - Resources
IS - 1
ER -