TY - JOUR
T1 - What Happens When Employers Can No Longer Discriminate in Job Ads?
AU - Kuhn, Peter
AU - Shen, Kailing
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Economic Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/4
Y1 - 2023/4
N2 - When employers’explicit gender requests were unexpectedly removed from a Chinese job board overnight, pools of successful applicants became more integrated: women’s (men’s) share of callbacks to jobs that had requested men (women) rose by 61 (146) percent. The removal “worked” in this sense because it generated a large increase in gender-mismatched applications, and because those applications were treated surprisingly well by employers, suggesting that employers’ gender requests often represented relatively weak preferences or outdated stereotypes. The job titles that were integrated by the ban, however, were not the most gendered ones, and were disproportionately lower-wage jobs.
AB - When employers’explicit gender requests were unexpectedly removed from a Chinese job board overnight, pools of successful applicants became more integrated: women’s (men’s) share of callbacks to jobs that had requested men (women) rose by 61 (146) percent. The removal “worked” in this sense because it generated a large increase in gender-mismatched applications, and because those applications were treated surprisingly well by employers, suggesting that employers’ gender requests often represented relatively weak preferences or outdated stereotypes. The job titles that were integrated by the ban, however, were not the most gendered ones, and were disproportionately lower-wage jobs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164739158&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1257/aer.20211127
DO - 10.1257/aer.20211127
M3 - Article
SN - 0002-8282
VL - 113
SP - 1013
EP - 1048
JO - American Economic Review
JF - American Economic Review
IS - 4
ER -