What makes a real man? Gender norms and Western Australia v. AH [2010] WASCA 172.

Ruth Townsend*, Danielle Klar, Thomas Faunce

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    In Western Australia v AH [2010] WASCA 172 the Western Australian Court of Appeal denied two female-to-male applicants for gender reassignment certificates the right to be legally recognised as men. In so doing, an opportunity was lost for Australia to be one of the first jurisdictions in the world to legally provide a reassignment of gender without requiring permanent sterilising surgery. This column examines not only the legal issues considered in the case but the broader ethical and human rights issues associated with denying female-to-male gender reassignment applicants who have not undergone a permanent sterilisation or genitalia alteration procedure, the right to be identified as males.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)478-497
    Number of pages20
    JournalJournal of law and medicine
    Volume18
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2011

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'What makes a real man? Gender norms and Western Australia v. AH [2010] WASCA 172.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this