What matters in the relationship between mentoring and job-related stress? the moderating effects of protégés' traditionality and trust in mentor

Jing Qian, Xiaosong Lin*, Zhuo R. Han, Zhen X. Chen, Jay M. Hays

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    9 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Mentoring received by protégés has been shown to play an important role in relieving protégés' job-related stress. However, literature on the relationship between mentoring and job-related stress has yielded mixed and inconclusive results. Our research seeks to reconcile the conflicting implications by examining protégés' individual traditionality and trust in mentor as moderators on the relationship between mentoring and job-related stress. We tested the hypotheses with data from a sample of 210 protégés from a large company in China. Results of our two-way and three-way interaction effect tests revealed that: (1) traditionality moderated the negative relationship between mentoring and job-related stress in such a way that the relationship was stronger for protégés with higher rather than lower traditionality; (2) the influence that mentoring had on job-related stress was strongest for protégés with both high traditionality and a high level of trust in mentor.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)608-623
    Number of pages16
    JournalJournal of Management and Organization
    Volume20
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2014

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'What matters in the relationship between mentoring and job-related stress? the moderating effects of protégés' traditionality and trust in mentor'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this