Abstract
Pain asymbolics feel pain, but act as if they are indifferent to it. Nikola Grahek argues that such patients present a clear counterexample to motivationalism about pain. I argue that Grahek has mischaracterized pain asymbolia. Properly understood, asymbolics have lost a general capacity to care about their bodily integrity. Asymbolics' indifference to pain thus does not show something about the intrinsic nature of pain; it shows something about the relationship between pains and subjects, and how that relationship might break down. I explore the consequences of such a view for both motivationalism and the categorization of pain asymbolia as a syndrome, arguing for a close link between asymbolia and various forms of depersonalization.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 493-516 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Mind |
| Volume | 124 |
| Issue number | 494 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What pain asymbolia really shows'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver