| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | The Oxford Handbook of Global Justice |
| Editors | Thom Brooks |
| Place of Publication | United Kingdom |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Pages | 1pp-22pp |
| Volume | 1 |
| Edition | 1st |
| Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Abstract
While there need be no conflict in theory between addressing global inequality (inequalities between people worldwide) and addressing domestic inequality (inequalities between people within a political community), there may be instances in which the feasible mechanism for reducing global inequality risks aggravating domestic inequality. The burgeoning literature on global justice has tended to overlook this type of scenario, and theorists espousing global egalitarianism have consequently not engaged with cases that are important for evaluating and clarifying the content of their theories. This chapter explores potential tensions between promoting global and domestic inequality. It introduces a class of second-best scenarios that global justice theorists have neglected in order to demonstrate the importance of such scenarios as an aid to constructing and evaluating ideals of global justice