What shape are the neural response functions underlying opponent coding in face space? A psychophysical investigation

Tirta Susilo*, Elinor McKone, Mark Edwards

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    45 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Recent evidence has shown that face space represents facial identity information using two-pool opponent coding. Here we ask whether the shape of the monotonic neural response functions underlying such coding is linear (i.e. face space codes all equal-sized physical changes with equal sensitivity) or nonlinear (e.g. face space shows greater coding sensitivity around the average face). Using adaptation aftereffects and pairwise discrimination tasks, our results for face attributes of eye height and mouth height demonstrate linear shape; including for bizarre faces far outside the normal range. We discuss how linear coding explains some results in the previous literature, including failures to find that adaptation enhances face discrimination, and suggest possible reasons why face space can maintain detailed coding of values far outside the normal range. We also discuss specific nonlinear coding models needed to explain other findings, and conclude face space appears to use a mixture of linear and nonlinear representations.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)300-314
    Number of pages15
    JournalVision Research
    Volume50
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 8 Feb 2010

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'What shape are the neural response functions underlying opponent coding in face space? A psychophysical investigation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this