TY - JOUR
T1 - What studios think they do
T2 - A study of Australian music recording studio websites
AU - O’Grady, Pat
AU - Goold, Lachlan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
PY - 2025/12/26
Y1 - 2025/12/26
N2 - Over a decade has passed since Eliot Bates examined ‘what studios do’. In the meantime, discussions surrounding decline and transformation in music production often depict a grim outlook for the future of large-format recording studios confluent with a burgeoning lower-cost, DAW-based DIY recording sector. This paper conducts a census of commercial recording studios along the east coast of Australia by gathering data from their websites. This approach offers a methodology to study recording studio cultures and explore what studios think they do. It offers insights into how studios present, communicate and promote themselves to prospective clients. The language used, promoted equipment and services offered all convey a particular position in the recording domain, with the goal of future business and stability for the studio. Beyond functional goals a recording studio purports to achieve, this article contends that studios don’t share a standard format of practice, they rely equally on the personnel that own and operate the facility and the technology within, they do not adequately acknowledge structural diversity issues in the sector, they assume that potential clients understand the value of specific technology, and they are diversifying beyond standard modes of practice to remain a viable business.
AB - Over a decade has passed since Eliot Bates examined ‘what studios do’. In the meantime, discussions surrounding decline and transformation in music production often depict a grim outlook for the future of large-format recording studios confluent with a burgeoning lower-cost, DAW-based DIY recording sector. This paper conducts a census of commercial recording studios along the east coast of Australia by gathering data from their websites. This approach offers a methodology to study recording studio cultures and explore what studios think they do. It offers insights into how studios present, communicate and promote themselves to prospective clients. The language used, promoted equipment and services offered all convey a particular position in the recording domain, with the goal of future business and stability for the studio. Beyond functional goals a recording studio purports to achieve, this article contends that studios don’t share a standard format of practice, they rely equally on the personnel that own and operate the facility and the technology within, they do not adequately acknowledge structural diversity issues in the sector, they assume that potential clients understand the value of specific technology, and they are diversifying beyond standard modes of practice to remain a viable business.
KW - Australian music recording sector
KW - cultural industries
KW - media technology
KW - music production
KW - recording studios
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105025815821
U2 - 10.1177/13548565251410668
DO - 10.1177/13548565251410668
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105025815821
SN - 1354-8565
JO - Convergence
JF - Convergence
ER -