Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

What voters want from their parties: Testing the promise-keeping assumption

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

How should party governments make representative democracy? Much of the democracy representation literature assumes that voters prefer parties to fulfill the promises of their election campaigns, with higher preference for promise-keeping placed on the party a voter supports. That voters agree with these assumptions, however, remains largely unclear and this is the main hypothesis of this article. Within the context of Australia, this article investigates voter preferences regarding three ideal party representative styles: promise-keeping, focus on public opinion, and seeking the common good. Furthermore, it tests whether voters prefer their party – over other parties – to keep their promises. Based on novel and innovative survey data, this study finds that, generally, voters care least about parties keeping their promises and their preferences are unaffected by their party support. These results, if confirmed in other contexts, not only challenge the primacy of promise-keeping, but also the assumed ubiquitous party effect.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)186-195
Number of pages10
JournalElectoral Studies
Volume57
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What voters want from their parties: Testing the promise-keeping assumption'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this