Whats love got to do with it? Why a child does not have a right to be loved

Mhairi Cowden*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    25 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    It is often stated in international and domestic legal documents that children have a right to be loved. Yet there is very little explanation of why this right exists or what it entails. Matthew Liao has recently sought to provide such an explanation by arguing that children have a right to be loved as a human right. I will examine Liaos explanation and in turn argue that children do not have a right to be loved. The first part of the paper will be concerned with showing that Liao cannot support his empirical claims. I will then argue that loving cannot be a duty, and that even if we were willing to concede that it is, love is not always accompanied by loving treatment. Finally, I consider two alternative interpretations of the right to be loved and argue that even given these, children do not have a right to be loved.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)325-345
    Number of pages21
    JournalCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
    Volume15
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2012

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Whats love got to do with it? Why a child does not have a right to be loved'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this