When Does Deliberation Begin? Internal Reflection versus Public Discussion in Deliberative Democracy

Robert E. Goodin*, Simon J. Niemeyer

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    174 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Political deliberation involves both internal reflection and public discussion. The former might be far more important than implied by deliberative democrats' heavy emphasis on the discursive component. Analysis of the deliberations of a citizen's jury on an Australian environmental issue shows jurors' attitudes changing more in response to the 'information' phase of the jury proceedings, involving a large degree of 'deliberation within', than during the formal 'discussion' phase. Various ways can be imagined for evoking internal reflection of that sort, even in mass-political settings.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)627-649
    Number of pages23
    JournalPolitical Studies
    Volume51
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2003

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'When Does Deliberation Begin? Internal Reflection versus Public Discussion in Deliberative Democracy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this