Where do IPBES delegates in Europe see challenges, needs, gaps and opportunities in policy uptake of “Nature’s contributions to people”?

Roger Keller*, Hans Keune, Simone Maynard

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This research note illustrates how European national delegates to the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) perceive the challenges, needs, gaps and opportunities related to the policy implementation of “Nature’s contributions to people (NCP)” in their nation. Until now, only little information has been available on how IPBES delegations perceive national policy-uptake and the implementation of the IPBES core concept of NCP. Based on an online survey with IPBES delegates, we aim to provide a stock-take of how IPBES delegations see NCP currently being incorporated in national government policies in Europe and how these policies are being implemented through programmes. Survey results show IPBES delegates consider a lack of relevant data and methodologies for NCP assessments to be a major obstacle to the uptake and implementation of NCP concepts in Europe. We wonder if availability of data and methodologies are the most prominent challenges to make IPBES a success, and consider the need for policy uptake and implementation to be more prominently addressed within the IPBES process.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)S116-S124
    JournalInnovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research
    Volume31
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 30 Mar 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Where do IPBES delegates in Europe see challenges, needs, gaps and opportunities in policy uptake of “Nature’s contributions to people”?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this