Abstract
Wierzbicka & Goddards (2017) (W&G) search for lexification in Warlpiri of the concept part has led them to the conclusion that part is a previously unrecognised additional sense of the common Warlpiri recognitional demon- strative yangka. We investigate their reductio ad absurdum and identify as- pects of their method and assumptions which have led them astray. These include: the relinquishing of the principle of monosemy (Ruhl, 1989), the failure to distinguish inferential pragmatics from intensional semantics, mis- apprehension of translation, overlooking the role of definitional templates (in PPJs vernacular definitions), and distortion of comparative evidence.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Meaning, Life and Culture: In conversation with Anna Wierzbicka |
| Editors | Helen Bromhead, Zhengdao Ye |
| Place of Publication | Canberra, Australia |
| Publisher | ANU Press |
| Pages | 461–489 |
| Volume | 1 |
| Edition | 1st |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781760463939 |
| Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Where we part from NSM: understanding Warlpiri yangka and the Warlpiri expression of part-hood'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver