'Which Love in Law?: Zenon Bankowski and the Meaning of Love'

Renata Grossi

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Zenon Bankowski has challenged the popular view that law and love are opposites. Instead he has argued that they are 'entangled', 'necessary', and even 'dependent' on each other. Together they form the 'unity' that is required for us to live a lawful life. He argues that to see them as opposites is not only inaccurate, but also constitutes a 'moral and cognitive failure'. If he is right, and we are to see love and law as connected to one another, the question arises of what he means when he talks of love. This inquiry will show that Bankowski relies on ideas of love that spring from the Classical (eros), the Christian (agape) and the romantic traditions; however I will argue that a conception of love that also fits his argument is friendship love (philia).
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)42-57
    JournalLaw in Context
    Volume34
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of ''Which Love in Law?: Zenon Bankowski and the Meaning of Love''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this