Whistleblowing and scientific misconduct: Renewing legal and virtue ethics foundations

Thomas Alured Faunce*, Susannah Jefferys

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    11 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Whistleblowing in relation to scientific research misconduct, despite the benefits of increased transparency and accountability it often has brought to society and the discipline of science itself, remains generally regarded as a pariah activity by many of the most influential relevant organizations. The motivations of whistleblowers and those supporting them continued to be questioned and their actions criticised by colleagues and management, despite statutory protections for reasonable disclosures appropriately made in good faith and for the public interest. One reason for this paradoxical position, explored here, is that whistle blowing concerning scientific misconduct lacks the policy support customarily derived from firm bioethical and jurisprudential foundations. Recommendations are made for altering this situation in the public interest.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)567-584
    Number of pages18
    JournalMedicine and Law
    Volume26
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2007

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Whistleblowing and scientific misconduct: Renewing legal and virtue ethics foundations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this