W(h)ither psychiatry? Contemporary challenges in Australian mental health workforce design

Sebastian Rosenberg*, Ian Hickie

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objective: To consider the changing profile of Australia’s mental health workforce and the implications, particularly for specialist psychiatry services. Method: We analyse data from a national collection that describes changes in the workforce over a decade, to 2017–2018. Results: While single practitioner-based psychological services flourish, other areas of more complex and team-based care are struggling to remain relevant. Psychiatry and mental health nursing, two areas that previously led Australia’s response to complex mental illness, are under enormous pressure. Conclusion: The shifting balance of specialised mental health workforces is affecting the mental healthcare available in each region of Australia. Questions arise regarding the desired or optimal mix of professionals we wish to deploy. What roles should each professional group play and how should they work together? What does this mean for how various groups should be trained and paid? These data challenge the role specialist psychiatry wishes to play in leading reform. Current mental health reforms risk foundering should psychiatrists fail to take up the challenge of leadership.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)297-299
    Number of pages3
    JournalAustralasian Psychiatry
    Volume28
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2020

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'W(h)ither psychiatry? Contemporary challenges in Australian mental health workforce design'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this