Who is to blame? The position of foreign languages in Australian society

Mario Daniel Martin

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

In a recent newspaper article for the Brisbane Courier Mail, Professor Lauchlan Chipman claimed that language professionals and administrators of Arts degrees are to blame for the crisis in language provision in Australian universities in the 1990s. He argues that they have brought the crisis on themselves by waiving the compulsory foreign language requirement to enrol in Bachelor of Arts degrees in the 1960s. This paper will address the symbolic.position of foreign languages in Australian society since Federation to the early 1970s to ascertain the accuracy of Professor Chipman 's statements.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the Marking Our Difference Conference
Subtitle of host publication2003 Conference on Language Education in Australian and New Zealand Universities
EditorsGillian Wigglesworth
Place of PublicationMelbourne
PublisherUniversity of Melbourne
Pages75-91
ISBN (Print)0734030576
Publication statusPublished - 2004
Externally publishedYes
EventMarking our Difference: Languages in Australian and New Zealand Universities Conference 2003 - University of Melbourne, School of Languages, Melbourne, Australia
Duration: 1 Oct 20033 Oct 2003
https://catalogue.nla.gov.au/catalog/3578997
https://webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/20040202105919/http://www.languages.unimelb.edu.au/conference/

Conference

ConferenceMarking our Difference
Country/TerritoryAustralia
CityMelbourne
Period1/10/033/10/03
Internet address

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Who is to blame? The position of foreign languages in Australian society'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this