Who's striking, and who's not? Avoiding and acknowledging bias in youth climate activism research

Hannah R. Feldman*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The School Strike 4 Climate is a timely opportunity for education and research sectors to support youth stories in climate change policy, and foster impactful relationships between researchers, teachers and students. But much research in this space has inherent selection biases where youth representation in research is limited by place (such as attendance at a protest), snowball sampling (often within already engaged groups) or through education channels (such as private or independent schools), ultimately leading to unrepresentative response samples. This comment explores the challenges and opportunities for equitable inclusion of teenage voices in environmental research, including some practical approaches (such as inclusion of public schools) to ensure more diverse samples are represented. Implications for how the existing body of research should be viewed is discussed, highlighting an existing lack of representation of students that do not overtly engage with climate activism or School Strikes.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)112-118
    Number of pages7
    JournalAustralian Journal of Environmental Education
    Volume38
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 14 Mar 2022

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Who's striking, and who's not? Avoiding and acknowledging bias in youth climate activism research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this