Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Why and How to Write a High-Impact Review Paper: Lessons From Eight Years of Editorial Board Service to Reviews of Geophysics

  • Mark B. Moldwin*
  • , Fabio Florindo
  • , Gregory Okin
  • , Alan Robock
  • , Eelco J. Rohling
  • , Bayani Cardenas
  • , Annmarie Carlton
  • , Kate Huihsuan Chen
  • , Michel Crucifix
  • , Andrew Gettelman
  • , Alun Hubbard
  • , Tomoo Katsura
  • , Thomas H. Painter
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    High-impact review papers describe and synthesize the current state of the art, the open questions and controversies, and provide ideas for future investigations. They are written not only for a specific scientific discipline but also for the broader Earth and space science community. They not only summarize the literature, but they also create a framework from which to understand the progress, problems, and connections between different communities, observations, models, and approaches. Here we describe how to write a high-impact review paper, and why you should consider writing one for Reviews of Geophysics.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)860-863
    Number of pages4
    JournalReviews of Geophysics
    Volume55
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Why and How to Write a High-Impact Review Paper: Lessons From Eight Years of Editorial Board Service to Reviews of Geophysics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this