Why do shape aftereffects increase with eccentricity?

Elena Gheorghiu*, Frederick A.A. Kingdom, Jason Bell, Rick Gurnsey

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    11 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Studies have shown that spatial aftereffects increase with eccentricity. Here, we demonstrate that the shape-frequency and shape-amplitude aftereffects, which describe the perceived shifts in the shape of a sinusoidal-shaped contour following adaptation to a slightly different sinusoidal-shaped contour, also increase with eccentricity. Why does this happen? We first demonstrate that the perceptual shift increases with eccentricity for stimuli of fixed sizes. These shifts are not attenuated by variations in stimulus size; in fact, at each eccentricity the degree of perceptual shift is scale-independent. This scale independence is specific to the aftereffect because basic discrimination thresholds (in the absence of adaptation) decrease as size increases. Structural aspects of the displays were found to have a modest effect on the degree of perceptual shift; the degree of adaptation depends modestly on distance between stimuli during adaptation and post-adaptation testing. There were similar temporal rates of decline of adaptation across the visual field and higher post-adaptation discrimination thresholds in the periphery than in the center. The observed results are consistent with greater sensitivity reduction in adapted mechanisms following adaptation in the periphery or an eccentricity-dependent increase in the bandwidth of the shape-frequency- and shape-amplitude-selective mechanisms.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-21
    Number of pages21
    JournalJournal of Vision
    Volume11
    Issue number14
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Why do shape aftereffects increase with eccentricity?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this