Why does leaf nitrogen decline within tree canopies less rapidly than light? An explanation from optimization subject to a lower bound on leaf mass per area

Roderick C. Dewar*, Lasse Tarvainen, Kathryn Parker, Göran Wallin, Ross E. McMurtrie

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    47 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    A long-established theoretical result states that, for a given total canopy nitrogen (N) content, canopy photosynthesis is maximized when the within-canopy gradient in leaf N per unit area (Na) is equal to the light gradient. However, it is widely observed that Na declines less rapidly than light in real plant canopies. Here we show that this general observation can be explained by optimal leaf acclimation to light subject to a lower-bound constraint on the leaf mass per area (ma). Using a simple model of the carbon-nitrogen (C-N) balance of trees with a steady-state canopy, we implement this constraint within the framework of the MAXX optimization hypothesis that maximizes net canopy C export. Virtually all canopy traits predicted by MAXX (leaf N gradient, leaf N concentration, leaf photosynthetic capacity, canopy N content, leaf-area index) are in close agreement with the values observed in a mature stand of Norway spruce trees (Picea abies L. Karst.). An alternative upper-bound constraint on leaf photosynthetic capacity (Asat) does not reproduce the canopy traits of this stand. MAXX subject to a lower bound on ma is also qualitatively consistent with co-variations in leaf N gradient, ma and Asat observed across a range of temperate and tropical tree species. Our study highlights the key role of constraints in optimization models of plant function.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)520-534
    Number of pages15
    JournalTree Physiology
    Volume32
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2012

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Why does leaf nitrogen decline within tree canopies less rapidly than light? An explanation from optimization subject to a lower bound on leaf mass per area'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this