Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? toward a new theory of holistic processing

Elinor Mckone*, Galit Yovel

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    254 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Classically, it has been presumed that picture-plane inversion primarily reduces sensitivity to spacing/ configural information in faces (distance between location of the major features) and has little effect on sensitivity to local feature information (e.g., eye shape or color). Here, we review 22 published studies relevant to this claim. Data show that the feature inversion effect varied substantially across studies as a function of the following factors: whether the feature change was shape only or included color/brightness, the number of faces in the stimulus set, and whether the feature was in facial context. For shape-only changes in facial context, feature inversion effects were as large as typical spacing inversion effects. Small feature inversion effects occurred only when a task could be efficiently solved by visual-processing areas outside whole-face coding. The results argue that holistic/configural processing for upright faces integrates exact feature shape and spacing between blobs. We describe two plausible approaches to this process.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)778-797
    Number of pages20
    JournalPsychonomic Bulletin and Review
    Volume16
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2009

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? toward a new theory of holistic processing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this