Why does Year Twelve retention differ between Australian states and territories?

Chris Ryan*, Louise Watson

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Year Twelve retention rates have a number of well-known deficiencies that prevent proper comparisons of school completion between school systems. This paper compares secondary school completion rates across Australian states and territories from 1989 to 2002 and adjusts 'official' 2002 retention rates to take account of the acknowledged measurement problems. We identify a pattern of mismeasurement of national Year Twelve retention over the 1990s. We estimate that the Year Twelve retention rate was a particularly poor measure of national school completion in the early 1990s, when it appeared to peak in the official estimates. In contrast to the official figures, our adjusted measure of Year Twelve retention was no lower in the late 1990s than it had been in the early 1990s. Our findings suggest that governments should be cautious in using official Year Twelve retention rates as a measure of the performance of Australian school systems.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)203-219
    Number of pages17
    JournalAustralian Journal of Education
    Volume50
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2006

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Why does Year Twelve retention differ between Australian states and territories?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this