Why moving to the right could be wrong for Dutton and the Coalition

Mark Kenny

Why moving to the right could be wrong for Dutton and the Coalition

Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › General Article

Abstract

Evidence that support for the Liberal Party is softening in its affluent inner-city homelands continues to accrue, while its hopes of capturing disgruntled voters in Labor seats in the suburbs and regions presume a historic shift in voting patterns.

Original language	English
Pages	Online
Specialist publication	The Conversation
Publication status	Published - 11 Apr 2024

Cite this

@misc{4cff556e7f7f46608fd0e9d497cae965,

title = "Why moving to the right could be wrong for Dutton and the Coalition",

abstract = "Evidence that support for the Liberal Party is softening in its affluent inner-city homelands continues to accrue, while its hopes of capturing disgruntled voters in Labor seats in the suburbs and regions presume a historic shift in voting patterns.",

author = "Mark Kenny",

year = "2024",

month = apr,

day = "11",

language = "English",

pages = "Online",

journal = "The Conversation",

publisher = "The Conversation Media Trust",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Why moving to the right could be wrong for Dutton and the Coalition

AU - Kenny, Mark

PY - 2024/4/11

Y1 - 2024/4/11

N2 - Evidence that support for the Liberal Party is softening in its affluent inner-city homelands continues to accrue, while its hopes of capturing disgruntled voters in Labor seats in the suburbs and regions presume a historic shift in voting patterns.

AB - Evidence that support for the Liberal Party is softening in its affluent inner-city homelands continues to accrue, while its hopes of capturing disgruntled voters in Labor seats in the suburbs and regions presume a historic shift in voting patterns.

M3 - General Article

SP - Online

JO - The Conversation

JF - The Conversation

ER -

Why moving to the right could be wrong for Dutton and the Coalition

Abstract

Fingerprint

Cite this