Why one century of phenetics is enough: Response to "are there really twice as many bovid species as we thought?"

Fenton P.D. Cotterill; Peter J. Taylor; Spartaco Gippoliti; Jacqueline M. Bishop; Colin P. Groves

doi:10.1093/sysbio/syu003

Why one century of phenetics is enough: Response to "are there really twice as many bovid species as we thought?"

Fenton P.D. Cotterill^*, Peter J. Taylor, Spartaco Gippoliti, Jacqueline M. Bishop, Colin P. Groves

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

51 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	819-832
Number of pages	14
Journal	Systematic Biology
Volume	63
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syu003
Publication status	Published - Sept 2014

Access to Document

10.1093/sysbio/syu003

Cite this

@article{7d818e3ceeca4f0bbe36bbc274bf1cd5,

title = "Why one century of phenetics is enough: Response to {"}are there really twice as many bovid species as we thought?{"}",

author = "Cotterill, {Fenton P.D.} and Taylor, {Peter J.} and Spartaco Gippoliti and Bishop, {Jacqueline M.} and Groves, {Colin P.}",

year = "2014",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1093/sysbio/syu003",

language = "English",

volume = "63",

pages = "819--832",

journal = "Systematic Biology",

issn = "1063-5157",

publisher = "Oxford University Press ",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why one century of phenetics is enough

T2 - Response to "are there really twice as many bovid species as we thought?"

AU - Cotterill, Fenton P.D.

AU - Taylor, Peter J.

AU - Gippoliti, Spartaco

AU - Bishop, Jacqueline M.

AU - Groves, Colin P.

PY - 2014/9

Y1 - 2014/9

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906250018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/sysbio/syu003

DO - 10.1093/sysbio/syu003

M3 - Review article

SN - 1063-5157

VL - 63

SP - 819

EP - 832

JO - Systematic Biology

JF - Systematic Biology

IS - 5

ER -

Why one century of phenetics is enough: Response to "are there really twice as many bovid species as we thought?"

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this