Why Right-Brain Teaching is Half-Witted: A Critique of the Misapplication of Neuroscience to Education

Annukka K. Lindell*, Evan Kidd

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Educational tools claiming to use "right-brain techniques" are increasingly shaping school curricula. By implying a strong scientific basis, such approaches appeal to educators who rightly believe that knowledge of the brain should guide curriculum development. However, the notion of hemisphericity (idea that people are "left-brained" or "right-brained") is a neuromyth that was debunked in the scientific literature 25 years ago. This article challenges the validity of "right-brain" teaching, highlighting the fact that neuroscientific research does not support its claims. Providing teachers with a basic understanding of neuroscience research as part of teacher training would enable more effective evaluation of brain-based claims and facilitate the adoption of tools validated by rigorous independent research rather than programs based on pseudoscience.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)121-127
Number of pages7
JournalMind, Brain, and Education
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why Right-Brain Teaching is Half-Witted: A Critique of the Misapplication of Neuroscience to Education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this