Abstract
Educational tools claiming to use "right-brain techniques" are increasingly shaping school curricula. By implying a strong scientific basis, such approaches appeal to educators who rightly believe that knowledge of the brain should guide curriculum development. However, the notion of hemisphericity (idea that people are "left-brained" or "right-brained") is a neuromyth that was debunked in the scientific literature 25 years ago. This article challenges the validity of "right-brain" teaching, highlighting the fact that neuroscientific research does not support its claims. Providing teachers with a basic understanding of neuroscience research as part of teacher training would enable more effective evaluation of brain-based claims and facilitate the adoption of tools validated by rigorous independent research rather than programs based on pseudoscience.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 121-127 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Mind, Brain, and Education |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2011 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Why Right-Brain Teaching is Half-Witted: A Critique of the Misapplication of Neuroscience to Education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver