Why Some Community By-Laws Stick and Others Slip Part 2 — An Adaptive Cycle Explanation

Miranda Forsyth, Sinclair Dinnen, Ali Tuhanuku, Anthea Roberts

Research output: Other contribution

Abstract

As explained in Part 1 of this In Brief series, our research
comprises a multi-country comparative analysis of
community rule-making in Melanesia. Across the region,
people are actively participating in the shaping and
reshaping of order in their communities, rather than
being the passive subjects of state or customary forms
of governance. We have found some examples of real
success — where by-laws have helped transform once
violent and unsafe neighbourhoods into more peaceful
and vibrant places where residents can sleep at night
and commercial activities occur without disruption.
We also found examples where these local innovations
can contribute to normative changes, such as around
the acceptability of family violence or violence more
broadly. On the other hand, there are many examples
of by-laws reinforcing the patriarchal authority of older
male leaders, suppressing other voices, such as those
of women and youth. By-laws often start as promising
initiatives but then slowly grind to a halt as momentum
runs out or obstacles are encountered.
Original languageEnglish
TypeBrief
PublisherCoral Bell School of Asia Pacific Affairs (ANU)
Number of pages2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why Some Community By-Laws Stick and Others Slip Part 2 — An Adaptive Cycle Explanation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this