Will international trade law inhibit or promote global artificial photosynthesis?

Artificial photosynthesis (AP) is an area of well-advanced research involving large international groups at the cutting edge of synthetic biology and nanotechnology. In simple terms it offers to produce a cheap source of hydrogen for fuel through using sunlight to split water, as well as making basic starches by a process involving absorption of carbon dioxide via the enzyme RuBisCO. As the proliferating numbers of university-based research teams working in this area begin to combine, there will be a natural escalation of the expected time for a global roll-out ofAP domestic and international devices. Policy attention will then turns to whether international governance systems (particularly including international trade law) will assist or hinder this process. The stakes are high - global AP offers a solution not only to human energy, food and water needs (burning hydrogen fuel creates pure water) but to the rising atmospheric carbon dixide levels linked to climate change problems. This paper begins to examine how governments seeking to promote and subsidize AP products may interact with international trade and investment law. It involves analysis in this context of WTO multilaterais and U.S. bilaterais in relation to intellectual monopoly privileges (IMPs), "Doha-minus" provisions, definitions of technological "innovation, " nonviolation nullification of benefits requirements, textual inhibitions on science-based cost-effectiveness assessment of new technolgies, as well as investor-state dispute settlement provisions.