Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Working with judicial review: The new operation of the Takeovers Panel

Emma Armson*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article examines the position of the Takeovers Panel in light of the scope for judicial review of its decisions. In 2000, the role of the Panel was transformed to make it the primary forum for resolving disputes during a takeover bid. However, opportunities for judicial review have the potential to compromise this role. The first judicial review cases reinforced these concerns in invalidating two Panel decisions. Following this, the Panel's jurisdiction was amended significantly and the High Court subsequently upheld its constitutional validity. The recent decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court in CEMEX Australia Pty Ltd v Takeovers Panel further strengthens the Panel's position in regard to judicial review of its decisions.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)657-683
    Number of pages27
    JournalMelbourne University Law Review
    Volume33
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Working with judicial review: The new operation of the Takeovers Panel'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this