Workplace familism and psychological contract breach in the Philippines

Simon Lloyd D. Restubog*, Prashant Bordia

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

82 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present study addresses the call for theory-based investigations on workplace familism. It contributes to the literature by proposing and testing the moderating role of workplace familism between psychological contract breach and civic virtue behaviour. We surveyed 267 full-time employees and found main effects of both types of workplace familism (i.e. workplace organisational and workplace supervisor familism) and breach of relational obligations on civic virtue behaviour. Workplace supervisor familism also moderated the relationship between breach and civic virtue behaviour, with the negative relationship between breach and civic virtue behaviour stronger when workplace supervisor familism was high. This suggests that employees with a high level of workplace supervisor familism may feel a sense of betrayal and, therefore, respond more negatively to contract breach. Implications for practice and directions for future research are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)563-585
Number of pages23
JournalApplied Psychology
Volume55
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Workplace familism and psychological contract breach in the Philippines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this