Would C 4 rice produce more biomass than C 3 rice?

J. R. Evans*, S. von Caemmerer

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    30 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Evidence suggests that C 4 plants produce greater amounts of biomass per unit of intercepted photosynthetically active radiation. This is due in large part to two factors. First, C 4 plants have a greater quantum yield than C 3 plants at 30°C (the C 4 advantage diminishes at lower temperatures and as atmospheric CO 2 partial pressures rise). Second, C 4 plants have greater rates of CO 2 assimilation per unit leaf nitrogen (this benefit diminishes as leaf area index and/or canopy nitrogen content increases). The protein cost of C 4 enzymes per unit chlorophyll is calculated and found to be similar to that of C 3 photosynthesis. However, the rate of CO 2 assimilation per unit nitrogen in C 4 plants is greater than that of C 3 plants because high CO 2 partial pressure in the bundle sheath cells enables Rubisco to operate near its maximum catalytic rate and suppresses photorespiration. Rice leaf anatomy is examined with respect to locating the C 4 metabolism. Chloroplasts in bundle sheath cells represent only a minute fraction of those present in the rice leaf. In addition, whereas mesophyll cells are immediately adjacent to bundle sheath cells in terrestrial C 4 leaves, there are numerous mesophyll cells between adjacent veins in rice, which would diminish the efficiency of the C 4 cycle. To engineer the C 4 pathway into rice is therefore a formidable challenge.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationStudies in Plant Science
    PublisherElsevier
    Pages53-71,I
    EditionC
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2000

    Publication series

    NameStudies in Plant Science
    NumberC
    Volume7
    ISSN (Print)0928-3420

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Would C 4 rice produce more biomass than C 3 rice?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this