TY - JOUR
T1 - Zfire
T2 - Similar stellar growth in hα-emitting cluster and field galaxies at z ∼ 2
AU - Tran, Kim Vy H.
AU - Alcorn, Leo Y.
AU - Kacprzak, Glenn G.
AU - Nanayakkara, Themiya
AU - Straatman, Caroline
AU - Yuan, Tiantian
AU - Cowley, Michael
AU - Davé, Romeel
AU - Glazebrook, Karl
AU - Kewley, Lisa J.
AU - Labbé, Ivo
AU - Martizzi, Davidé
AU - Papovich, Casey
AU - Quadri, Ryan
AU - Spitler, Lee R.
AU - Tomczak, Adam
PY - 2017/1/10
Y1 - 2017/1/10
N2 - We compare galaxy scaling relations as a function of environment at z ∼ 2 with our ZFIRE survey12 where we have measured Hα fluxes for 90 star-forming galaxies selected from a mass-limited (log(Mz.astModot) > 9) sample based on ZFOURGE.13 The cluster galaxies (37) are part of a confirmed system at z=2.095 and the field galaxies (53) are at 1.9 < z < 2.4; all are in the COSMOS legacy field. There is no statistical difference between Hα- emitting cluster and field populations when comparing their star formation rate (SFR), stellar mass (M∗), galaxy size (reff ), SFR surface density (σ(H star)), and stellar age distributions. The only difference is that at fixed stellar mass, the Hα-emitting cluster galaxies are log(reff ) ∼ 0.1 larger than in the field. Approximately 19% of the Hα-emitters in the cluster and 26% in the field are IR-luminous (LIR > 2>× 1011 L⊙). Because the luminous IR galaxies in our combined sample are ∼5 times more massive than the low-IR galaxies, their radii are ∼70% larger. To track stellar growth, we separate galaxies into those that lie above, on, or below the Hα star-forming main sequence (SFMS) using δSFR(M∗)=±0.2 dex. Galaxies above the SFMS (starbursts) tend to have higher Hα SFR surface densities and younger light-weighted stellar ages than galaxies below the SFMS. Our results indicate that starbursts (+SFMS) in the cluster and field at z ∼ 2 are growing their stellar cores. Lastly, we compare to the (SFR-M∗) relation from RHAPSODY-G cluster simulations and find that the predicted slope is nominally consistent with the observations. However, the predicted cluster SFRs tend to be too low by a factor of ∼2, which seems to be a common problem for simulations across environment.
AB - We compare galaxy scaling relations as a function of environment at z ∼ 2 with our ZFIRE survey12 where we have measured Hα fluxes for 90 star-forming galaxies selected from a mass-limited (log(Mz.astModot) > 9) sample based on ZFOURGE.13 The cluster galaxies (37) are part of a confirmed system at z=2.095 and the field galaxies (53) are at 1.9 < z < 2.4; all are in the COSMOS legacy field. There is no statistical difference between Hα- emitting cluster and field populations when comparing their star formation rate (SFR), stellar mass (M∗), galaxy size (reff ), SFR surface density (σ(H star)), and stellar age distributions. The only difference is that at fixed stellar mass, the Hα-emitting cluster galaxies are log(reff ) ∼ 0.1 larger than in the field. Approximately 19% of the Hα-emitters in the cluster and 26% in the field are IR-luminous (LIR > 2>× 1011 L⊙). Because the luminous IR galaxies in our combined sample are ∼5 times more massive than the low-IR galaxies, their radii are ∼70% larger. To track stellar growth, we separate galaxies into those that lie above, on, or below the Hα star-forming main sequence (SFMS) using δSFR(M∗)=±0.2 dex. Galaxies above the SFMS (starbursts) tend to have higher Hα SFR surface densities and younger light-weighted stellar ages than galaxies below the SFMS. Our results indicate that starbursts (+SFMS) in the cluster and field at z ∼ 2 are growing their stellar cores. Lastly, we compare to the (SFR-M∗) relation from RHAPSODY-G cluster simulations and find that the predicted slope is nominally consistent with the observations. However, the predicted cluster SFRs tend to be too low by a factor of ∼2, which seems to be a common problem for simulations across environment.
KW - galaxies: evolution
KW - galaxies: star formation
KW - galaxies: starburst
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010041702&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/101
DO - 10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/101
M3 - Article
SN - 0004-637X
VL - 834
JO - Astrophysical Journal
JF - Astrophysical Journal
IS - 2
M1 - 101
ER -