Zweitmeinung - "Second opinion" fiktiver nutzen oder beitrag zur qualitätsverbesserung?

Translated title of the contribution: Second opinion: Is it of fictitious value or a contribution to quality improvement?

H. D. Röher^*, K. M. Schulte

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Translated title of the contribution	Second opinion: Is it of fictitious value or a contribution to quality improvement?
Original language	German
Pages (from-to)	1-5
Number of pages	5
Journal	Viszeralchirurgie
Volume	36
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-11144
Publication status	Published - 2001
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

@article{f60db6474caf4edd9e7df145ea3b0b2d,

title = "Zweitmeinung - {"}Second opinion{"} fiktiver nutzen oder beitrag zur qualit{\"a}tsverbesserung?",

author = "R{\"o}her, {H. D.} and Schulte, {K. M.}",

year = "2001",

doi = "10.1055/s-2001-11144",

language = "German",

volume = "36",

pages = "1--5",

journal = "Viszeralchirurgie",

issn = "1435-3067",